
Animal Testing
Discussion Questions
-
​Should animal testing be legal?
-
Is there a cut-off for which animals can be tested on?
-
Does the well-being of humans matter more than the well-being of animals?
-
Are there certain ethical forms of animal testing?
-
Are there effective alternatives to animal testing?
Research
Medical Discoveries
-
Testing on dogs led to the discovery of insulin in the early 20th century, which has saved the lives of millions of diabetics worldwide (1).
-
Animal testing was used to develop the polio vaccine, which has reduced the disease to near-irrelevance (1).
-
The hepatitis B vaccine was developed using chimpanzees for testing (1).
-
Advances in breast cancer, brain trauma, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, and tuberculosis are directly attributable to animal experimentation (1).
-
Animal research was instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics (3, 4, 5, 6).
-
Researchers Joseph and Charles Vacanti grew a human "ear" seeded from implanted cow cartilage cells on the back of a living mouse to explore the possibility of fabricating body parts for plastic and reconstructive surgery (40).
Humaneness
-
According to the Humane Society International, animals are routinely force-fed, forced to inhale noxious compounds, deprived of food and water, physically restrained, and burned. Some animals even have their eyes clipped open, necks broken, and are decapitated (1, 7).
-
In 2010, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that almost 100,000 animals suffered pain during experiments (1, 7).
-
Animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act since 1966 including enclosure size, temperature, access to clean food and water standards for research animals, and regular veterinarian inspections (25).
-
The Animal Welfare Act does not apply to rats, mice, fish, and birds, which account for 95% of the animals used in research (28). The animals covered by the Animal Welfare Act account for fewer than one million animals used in research facilities each year, leaving 25 million other animals without protection (29, 30, 31, 32, 33).
-
Violations of the Animal Welfare Act at the federally funded Lousiana New Iberia Research Center in Louisiana led primates to severe psychological damage and engagement in self-mutilation (38).
-
All animal testing proposals must be approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (26, 27).
Animal Similarities
-
Chimpanzees and humans share 99 percent of their DNA, and mice and humans share 98 percent (1, 12).
-
A Mayo Clinic study revealed that 25 compounds that reduces the damage of ischemic strokes in cats and rodents had no beneficial effect whatsoever in people (1).
-
In the 1950s the sleeping pill, thalidomide, which was tested on animals prior to its commercial release, led 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities (14). Later tests on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses (15, 16).
-
Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed a protective effect on the hearts of mice. However, the drug caused over 27,000 human heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths (17, 18).
-
According to cell biologist Robin Lovell-Badge, 94 percent of drugs that passed tests in animals failed in people (1).
-
Some chemicals, like Aspirin and intravenous vitamin C, are ineffective or harmful to animals are valuable when used by humans (22) (24). Fk-506 (tacrolimus), used to lower the risk of organ transplant rejection, was “almost shelved” because of animal test results (22).
Alternatives
-
Human genes cloned into microorganisms can yield more specific toxicology results than testing on animals (1).
-
COVID-19 demonstrated that researchers can skip animal testing and go straight to observing how vaccines work in humans (8).
-
College Medical Professor Nikolai Petrovsky and College Medical Dean Peter Hotez describe that testing vaccines on animals is essential to prevent “vaccine enhancement” where a vaccine makes the disease worse (9) (10) (11).
-
Vitro testing, tests done on human cells or tissue in a petri dish, can reduce animal testing (13).
-
3D printing allows the possibility for tissue bio-printing. A French company is working to bio-print a liver that can test the toxicity of a drug (21). Artificial human skin, such as the commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert, can be made from sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes or plastic wells and may produce more useful results than testing chemicals on animal skin (13, 19, 20)
-
Studying cell cultures in a petri dish does not allow the study of interrelated processes occurring in the central nervous system, endocrine system, and immune system and conditions such as blindness and high blood pressure (12). Furthermore, evaluating a drug for side effects requires a circulatory system to carry the medicine to different organs (13).
-
Laboratory mice live for only two to three years, so researchers can study the effects of treatments or genetic manipulation over a whole lifespan and across several generations, which would be infeasible using human subjects (12, 34).
Additional Statistics
-
About 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing (2).
-
Humane Society International found that animal tests were more expensive than in vitro (testing performed outside of living organisms) in every scenario studied (40).
-
A poll of 3,748 by the Pew Research Center found that 89 percent of scientists favored the use of animals in scientific research (37).
-
A USDA January 2020 report found that in one year of research, California used more cats (1,682) for testing than any other state. Ohio used the most guinea pigs (35,206), and Massachusetts used the most dogs (6,771) and primates (11,795) (39).
Works Cited
Crystal, Mike. “Pros & Cons of Animal Testing.” Sciencing, 2 Mar. 2019, sciencing.com/animal-testing-pros-cons-8012597.html.
“Safety Testing in Animals.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., www.britannica.com/technology/pharmaceutical-industry/Safety-testing-in-animals.
AnimalResearch.info, "Diseases & Research," animalresearch.info (accessed Oct. 15, 2013)
Elizabeth Fisher, "Why We Should Accept Animal Testing," huffingtonpost.co.uk, July 17, 2013
Speaking of Research, "Alternatives?," speakingofresearch.com (accessed Oct. 15, 2013)
American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, "Animal Research FAQ," aalas.org (accessed Oct. 15, 2013)
Humane Society International, "About Animal Testing," hsi.org (accessed Oct. 15, 2013)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, "Coronavirus Vaccine: NIH Isn’t Waiting for Pointless Animal Tests,” peta.org, Mar. 16, 2020
Bruce Einhorn, "A Virus Cure Depends on Rare Lab Mice, But There Aren’t Enough,” bloomberg.com, Mar. 11, 2020
Rachel L. Roper; and Kristina E. Rehm, "SARS Vaccines: Where Are We?,” medscape.com, 2009
Julie Steenhuysen, "As Pressure for Coronavirus Vaccine Mounts, Scientists Debate Risks of Accelerated Testing,” reuters.com, Mar. 11, 2020
California Biomedical Research Association, "CBRA Fact Sheet: Why Are Animals Necessary in Biomedical Research?," ca-biomed.org (accessed Oct. 15, 2013)
Kara Rogers, "Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report," britannica.com, Sep. 17, 2007
Science Museum (UK), "Thalidomide," sciencemuseum.org.uk (accessed Oct. 17, 2013)
Ray Greek, MD, et al., "The History and Implications of Testing Thalidomide on Animals," Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law, Oct. 3, 2011
John J. Pippin, MD and Kristie Sullivan, MPH, "Dangerous Medicine: Examples of Animal-Based 'Safety' Tests Gone Wrong," Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine website (accessed Oct. 23, 2013)
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), "Vioxx Tragedy Spotlights Failure of Animal Research," pcrm.org, Mar. 2005
NBC News, "Report: Vioxx Linked to Thousands of Deaths," nbcnews.com, Oct. 6, 2004Geoff Watts, "Alternatives to Animal Experimentation," BMJ, Jan. 27, 2007Axonn News Agency, "Greiner Bio-One Launches Artificial Skin to Replace Animal Testing," zenopa.com, July 15, 2013Jonathan Smith, "Can Biotechnology Reduce Animal Testing in Medicine?,” labiotech.eu, Apr. 8, 2019Aysha Akhtar, MD, MPH, Animals and Public Health: Why Treating Animals Better Is Critical to Human Welfare, 2012Arthur Allen, "Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing," slate.com, June 1, 2006Emily Trunnell, "The University of Pittsburgh Is Using Taxpayer Dollars to Conduct Cruel and Unnecessary Animal Experiments," alternet.org, Sep. 7, 2017Animal Welfare Act, gpo.gov, last amended June 18, 2008Christian E. Newcomer, VMD, email to ProCon.org, Oct. 11, 2013Americans for Medical Progress, "Animal Research FAQs: The Top 10 Questions," amprogress.org (accessed Oct. 15, 2013)Charlotte Hu, "Of Mice and Model Organisms,” cshl.edu, July 31, 2019The Hastings Center, "Fact Sheet: Animals Used in Research in the U.S.," animalresearch.thehastingscenter.org (accessed Oct. 15, 2013)Speaking of Research, "US Statistics," speakingofresearch.com (accessed Oct. 15, 2013)US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), "Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year: 2010," aphis.usda.gov, July 27, 2011US Department of Agriculture, "Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year,” aphis.usda.gov, Jan. 7, 2020The Humane Society of the United States, "Animals Used in Biomedical Research FAQ,” humane society.org (accessed Mar. 17, 2020)George Dvorsky, "Do These Startling Longevity Studies Mean Your Lifespan Could Double?," io9.com, Apr. 30, 2013Tibor R. Machan, "Animals Do Not Have Rights," nytimes.com, Apr. 5, 2012A. Barton Hinkle, "Do Animals Have Rights?," reason.com, Sep. 23, 2011Carly Funk and Lee Rainie, "Public and Scientists' Views on Science and Society," pewinternet.org, Jan. 29, 2015Humane Society of the United States, "Undercover Investigation Reveals Cruelty to Chimps at Research Lab," humanesociety.org, Mar. 4, 2009US Department of Agriculture, "Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year,” aphis.usda.gov, Jan. 7, 2020Karl S. Kruszelnicki, "Mouse with Human Ear," abc.net.au, June 2, 2006“Pros & Cons - ProCon.org.” Animal Testing, 10 June 2020, animal-testing.procon.org/.Crystal, Mike. “Pros & Cons of Animal Testing.” Sciencing, 2 Mar. 2019, sciencing.com/animal-testing-pros-cons-8012597.html.